What interview technique is used to eliminate innocent employees from suspicion?

The Selective Interviewing Technique is designed to eliminate innocent employees from suspicion by focusing on specific information or behaviors that might indicate wrongdoing. This technique strategically narrows down the scope of questioning to check for inconsistencies in the accounts of those being interviewed. By doing so, it helps interviewers distinguish between potentially culpable individuals and those who are truly innocent.

In practice, this method usually involves asking targeted questions that relate to specific incidents or areas of concern while allowing the interviewee to explain their perspective. This not only helps to clarify details but also allows the interviewer to gauge credibility based on the responses received.

The other methods mentioned, while useful in their own right, do not specifically target the aim of eliminating innocent parties. Directive Interviewing tends to be more structured and may inadvertently pressure the interviewee. Non-accusatory Interviewing focuses more on establishing rapport, which may not effectively sift through suspicion. Open-ended Interviewing encourages expansive answers but may not lead to the focused determination of innocence or guilt required in certain investigations.