A Loss Prevention representative waiting for a call regarding theft and then responding is practicing which approach?

The correct answer highlights the behavior of a Loss Prevention representative who is responding to incidents as they occur rather than taking preemptive measures to stop them beforehand. A reactive loss prevention approach involves actions taken after an event has already happened, such as investigating reported thefts or responding to alerts about suspicious activity.

In this scenario, the representative is waiting for a call concerning theft, which indicates that they are in a position where they respond to situations rather than initiating preventive strategies. This is characteristic of a reactive approach, which focuses on addressing issues post-incident, rather than on measures that might prevent the theft from occurring in the first place.

Being aware of the different approaches helps in understanding their application within the field of loss prevention. The other options refer to different strategies: proactive approaches look to prevent issues before they arise, active approaches involve constant engagement and vigilance, and preventative measures are designed to deter theft before it happens. Each of these strategies plays a role in a comprehensive loss prevention program, but in this specific situation, the reactive approach is the appropriate classification.